In Defense of Animals Blasts USDA for Forcing Elephant Move to Controversial Zoo

Unprecedented deal sends Queenie to San Antonio Zoo, denying her retirement to a natural-habitat sanctuary

San Rafael, Calif. – In Defense of Animals (IDA) sent a letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack today, blasting the agency for a settlement agreement that will send a 53-year-old Asian elephant named Queenie to a grossly inadequate exhibit at the San Antonio Zoo. The transfer is a condition for settlement of federal animal welfare charges against her handler, Will Davenport. IDA supports sending Queenie to the spacious PAWS Sanctuary, which months ago made a formal offer  to provide a home for her.

“IDA supports removing Queenie from her negligent circus handler, but vehemently opposes sending her to the San Antonio Zoo as its exhibit is unfit even for the one elephant it presently holds,” said Catherine Doyle, IDA elephant campaign director.

“If the USDA were acting in Queenie’s best interest it would let her retire to the PAWS Sanctuary where she would have the best possible quality of life, including a 50-acre habitat to roam, high quality care, and the peace and quiet she deserves after a lifetime in the circus.”

In the letter to Vilsack IDA criticized the USDA’s choice of the San Antonio Zoo, which has been at the center of controversy over its solitary Asian elephant, Lucky, who lives in an antiquated, less than half-acre display. IDA cited welfare concerns and the fact that the zoo’s future plans do not include Asian elephants, meaning Lucky and any other Asian elephants will be moved out. The zoo has twice topped IDA’s annual list of the Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants.

“The USDA’s action does not help Lucky or Queenie,” said Doyle. “Cramming two elephants into the zoo’s tiny display will just make things worse.”

IDA has been working for three years to rescue Queenie because of abuse and negligent treatment. The USDA seized two other elephants, Tina and Jewel, from Davenport in August 2009 due to their seriously deteriorating heath; both were sent to the San Diego Zoo for specialized medical care. The USDA agreement sets aside $85,000 out of $100,000 in fines in exchange for Queenie’s transfer to the San Antonio Zoo, in settlement for multiple violations of the Animal Welfare Act involving all three elephants.

Read IDA’s letter to the USDA here: http://www.helpelephants.com/VILSACK_LTR_QUEENIE_F_410.pdf
A copy of IDA’s letter to the USDA is available upon request. For more information, visit www.HelpElephants.com.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

April 19, 2010

Contact: Catherine Doyle, 323-301-5730, zoos@idausa.org
Deborah Robinson, 860-836-7761, circuses@idausa.org

In Defense of Animals is an international animal protection organization located in San Rafael, Calif. dedicated to protecting animals' rights, welfare, and habitat through education, outreach, and our hands-on rescue facilities in Mumbai, India, Cameroon, Africa, and rural Mississippi. _________________________________________________________________________________

IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS • 3010 KERNER BLVD. • SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 • 415-448-0048

3 Comments on “In Defense of Animals Blasts USDA for Forcing Elephant Move to Controversial Zoo”

  • Joan Fink wrote on 19 April, 2010, 14:59

    How can you justify not sending Queenie to Paws Sanctuary? What possible reason would you have for sending her to the San Antonio Zoo with it’s half acre display, when she could have 50 acres to roam? What are we to think of the USDA? Are you not committed to provide for the welfare of the animals under your care? We have followed the sad plight of Queenie for so long and hoped you would at long last allow her sanctuary for the rest of her life. Instead you have opted to continue her misery when refuge has been freely offered to her by Paws. Why? Have you no compassion for the life of agony she has been forced to lead.? You were half way there by removing Queenie from Davenport’s care, that action is much appreciated. Could you not change her destination and send her to PAWS completing the rescue she has long awaited? We wait for this outcome along with Queenie. We will not forget her and beg of you to find it in your hearts to grant her the life she so richly deserves.

  • Nancy hepler wrote on 26 April, 2010, 7:37

    I was hoping queenie and lucky could be sent to a sanctuary.
    I fail to understand why elephants have to be 3/4 dead like
    “Ned” to be sent. I thought the USDA was supposed to help and
    protect animals. They cannot help themselves.

    Can you really sleep at night after allowing these elephants
    to continue their suffering?

    Sincerely

    n.l. Hepler

  • susan wrote on 29 May, 2010, 23:03

    Its time to let this elephant go back to a reserve, no more cages, no more crulity, no more money, no more ignorence,no more ZOOS

Write a Comment

Gravatars are small images that can show your personality. You can get your gravatar for free today!

Copyright © 2012 IDA News.